| Author | Topic |
Posts: 30
Registered: April 2007
|
|
|
Posts: 413
Registered: May 2004
|
|
|
Posts: 183
Registered: July 2008
|
|
|
Posts: 413
Registered: May 2004
|
|
|
Posts: 80
Registered: August 2005
|
|
|
Posts: 183
Registered: July 2008
|
|
|
Posts: 961
Registered: October 2003
|
|
Re: no getFormula for function definitions
|
09 Jan '09 17:08
|
 |
|
lpsmith> No, sorry, the other way around: a list of
lpsmith> functions not recognized by SBML_formulaToString,
lpsmith> but valid in some other level of SBML. Should I
lpsmith> just look at the list in 3.4.1 of the L2 spec,
lpsmith> and figure out what's there that's not in
lpsmith> Appendix C of L1?
I'm not aware of one, but now that you mention it, what a
nice idea! :-). This should go into the wiki, or FAQ, or
both. If you do end up creating such a list, will you
please post it? (Or volunteer to put it on the wiki, but
even if you just post it here, I can take it from there.)
MH
____________________________________________________________
To manage your libsbml-development list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/libsbml-development
For a web interface to the libsbml-development mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/
For questions or feedback about the libsbml-development list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
|
|
|