Forums

> Why complicate matters further by adding another special case when
> interpreting SBML (e.g. SBML L1v1, L1v2, L2v1 allow for local
> parameters, L2v2 turn local parameter processing off)?

Alternatively, let's keep the parameter system as it is, but let's decide
the ids of the various model components are in different namespaces. What
is the use of having compartments, species and parameter ids in the same
namespace?

In SBMLeditor, we keep record of the different lists, and only the metaid
are file-wide (am-I wrong Nicolas?). I strongly suspect this is the case
of almost all software.

--
Nicolas LE NOVÈRE, Computational Neurobiology,
EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK
Tel: +44(0)1223 494 521, Fax: +44(0)1223 494 468, Mob: +33(0)689218676
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov