Re: Constructors in extension elements
11 Apr '12 15:47
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:12:12 +0200, Andreas Dräger wrote:
> Is there already a general rule which constructors are required when
> implementing extension elements?
> It seems there should there always be an empty constructor and one that
> takes the usual arguments Level and Version. But how about the package
If this doesn't exist already, there should be common guidelines for every extension -- i.e., rules that say there should always be a constructor, always be methods X, Y, and Z, etc. All extensions should follow a minimum interface set.
> Should constructors of package elements throw an exception when trying
> to initialize them with Level Version combinations before 3.1 (but with
> a defined LV, i.e., other than -1.-1)?
This makes sense to me. It could be a IllegalArgumentException.
To manage your jsbml-development list subscription, visit
For a web interface to the jsbml-development mailing list, visit
For questions or feedback about the jsbml-development list,
Powered by FUDforum. (Copyright Advanced Internet Designs Inc.)