| Author | Topic |
Posts: 73
Registered: September 2003
|
|
Re: DSMTS -00304 model
|
12 May '12 08:45
|
 |
|
I can't see any problem with that model. All I can think is that you are not checking for events being triggered immediately after each reaction event, or not recomputing hazards properly after events have fired.
Cheers,
Darren
--
Darren Wilkinson
email: darrenjwilkinson@btinternet.com
www: http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/d.j.wilkinson/
________________________________
From: Ilya <axec@systemsbiology.ru>
To: sbml-discuss@caltech.edu
Sent: Friday, 11 May 2012, 12:22
Subject: [sbml-discuss] DSMTS -00304 model
Hi all.
I'am currently developing a stochastic solver. One of the aims is to pass all DSMTS tests. For now I have managed to pass all tests except the test for -003-04 model, here I stably got 20-25 mean values comparison failed.
I have tried available simulators: Fern also failes the test, COPASI does not support stochastic simulation with events.
Could anyone suggest stochastic solver which is able to pass this test? Or probably advice the way to handle it? I've tried original Gillespie and Gibson Bruck algorithms.
Thanks in advance.
____________________________________________________________
To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss
For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/
For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
____________________________________________________________
To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss
For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/
For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
|
|
|