Re: Possible change to libSBML API
23 Sep '08 10:01
Just so these stayed filed together!
Reply from Frank Bergmann
> Hello Sarah,
> I agree with ralph, all points 1-4 need to be addressed. As you asked
> for our preference, of A, B or C, that means that A falls flat :) ...
> I do think that option B while not braking the API will be cumbersome
> to use, as you might confuse the call that did change the
> mModificationFailed variable. Thus I prefer option C, and with ralphs
> hint that should be released as libsbml 3.3 ...
To manage your libsbml-development list subscription, visit
For a web interface to the libsbml-development mailing list, visit
For questions or feedback about the libsbml-development list,
Powered by FUDforum. (Copyright Advanced Internet Designs Inc.)