Forums

lpsmith> Here's my proposal, which is easy for me to make
lpsmith> because I don't have to code it, but here it is
lpsmith> anyway: I think there should be an 'L3 Packages'
lpsmith> page that provides information on each package's
lpsmith> status:

I agree with Nicolas about this; these are great suggestions
for incorporating into a revamp of the current list of
packages on http://sbml.org/Community/Wiki/. Thanks for
proposing these ideas.

lpsmith> That said, to get back to the 'groups' package:
lpsmith> since Mike is proposing it, and since he's in
lpsmith> charge of the libSBML group, and since the
lpsmith> package itself doesn't sound too complicated to
lpsmith> begin with, I think it won't take a ton of
lpsmith> persuasion to get him to add the package to the
lpsmith> to-do list for his developers (as long as he
lpsmith> still has $$ for them, of course), and I wouldn't
lpsmith> expect an unreasonable amount of time before
lpsmith> libSBML would support it.

Notwithstanding the valid points that Nicolas brought up in
his reply, I think the above is correct in that we'd be
motivated to do the work to implement a groups plug-in for
libsbml.

MH

____________________________________________________________
To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss

For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/

For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu