| Author | Topic |
|---|
Posts: 307
Location:
Cambridge UK
Registered:
February 2005
|
|
Re: SBO parsing and biojava
|
09 Dec '10 08:56
|
 |
|
On 12/09/2010 04:38 PM, Andreas Draeger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, the biojava jar is trimmed to the absolutely minimum of necessary
> classes just for ontology parsing. In my tests it worked so far and I
> couldn't see bigger problems. But if you, Nico, find serious problems
> with this parser, we should consider to use something else.
>
> I packed this slim biojava JAR long time ago, i.e., when we started
> implementing JSBML. It is therefore a subset of BioJava 1.7. Now the
> version number in BioJava is already 3. We should have a look if this
> works better and then switch.
>
I did not find any ontology package on the current version 3 of biojava.
Nico
____________________________________________________________
To manage your jsbml-development list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsbml-development
For a web interface to the jsbml-development mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/
For questions or feedback about the jsbml-development list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
|
|
|
