Re: SBO parsing and biojava
09 Dec '10 08:56
On 12/09/2010 04:38 PM, Andreas Draeger wrote:
> Yes, the biojava jar is trimmed to the absolutely minimum of necessary
> classes just for ontology parsing. In my tests it worked so far and I
> couldn't see bigger problems. But if you, Nico, find serious problems
> with this parser, we should consider to use something else.
> I packed this slim biojava JAR long time ago, i.e., when we started
> implementing JSBML. It is therefore a subset of BioJava 1.7. Now the
> version number in BioJava is already 3. We should have a look if this
> works better and then switch.
I did not find any ontology package on the current version 3 of biojava.
To manage your jsbml-development list subscription, visit
For a web interface to the jsbml-development mailing list, visit
For questions or feedback about the jsbml-development list,