Forums

On 29/11/11 22:18, Darren Wilkinson wrote:
> --- On Tue, 29/11/11, Michael Hucka<mhucka@caltech.edu> wrote:
>> This problem was the original reason why SBO was
>> invented. Adding SBO terms to the model should be
>> enough to help a tool determine the assumptions underlying a
>> model.
>>
>> Why is that not enough for this?
>
> Because SBO terms can not (and should not) affect the mathematical interpretation of the model.

Not the mathematical interpretation of the *model*, but the conceptual
framework it is meant to be used with. This is the whole point of the
"modelling framework" branch. Each MathML of the "mathematical expression"
branch carries a semantic element specifically for this purpose.

If I remember well Darren, you attended the dedicated meeting in Boston
that put the initial branches together :-)

> Cheers,
>
> Darren
>
> --
> Darren Wilkinson
> email: darrenjwilkinson@btinternet.com
> www: http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/d.j.wilkinson/
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
> https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss
>
> For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
> http://sbml.org/Forums/
>
> For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
> contact sbml-team@caltech.edu


--
Nicolas LE NOVERE, Computational Systems Neurobiology, EMBL-EBI, WTGC,
Hinxton CB101SD UK, Mob:+447833147074, Tel:+441223494521 Fax:468,
lenov@ebi.ac.uk, Skype:n.lenovere, twitter:@lenovere
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov/, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/compneur/

Fight against prostate cancer (and support my moustache):
Donate at http://mobro.co/lenov

____________________________________________________________
To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss

For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/

For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu