I'm not sure I am following what you're saying below -- do
you mean that in addition to the 4 alternatives already
presented, you wanted to see a 5th consisting of the 3
parts you have listed there?
MH
>>>>> On 19 Dec 2005, Stefan Hoops <shoops@vbi.vt.edu> wrote:
shoops> It seems to me that the set of options I have to choose from is
shoops> not complete I would like the following:
shoops>
shoops> (I) Remove the ordering constraints on assignment rules.
shoops> (II) Introduce a similar ordering constraint on reactions and
shoops> AssignmentRules combined.
shoops> (III) Allow assignment rules to be functions of reaction fluxes AND vice
shoops> versa.