Forums

F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Search Search
SBML Discussions » sbml-discuss » Ancillary equations in SBML models
Show: Today's Posts  :: Message Navigator
| Subscribe to topic 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
Nicolas Le Novere


Posts: 469
Registered:
October 2003
Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models 05 Aug '08 15:20 Go to previous messageGo to previous message

Robert Phair wrote:
> For Nicolas' particular cases:
>
> "More subtle:
>
> dx/dt = k * C * Y / (K + Y) where C = [calcium/calmodulin]/[total
> calmodulin]
>
> You would declare A as a modifier
>
> but
>
> dx/dt = k * P * Y / (K + Y) where P = pH
>
> You would not declare P as a modifier, but as a parameter
>
> Even if pH is in fact proportional to the concentration of H+"
>
> In the case of the reaction controlled by calcium:CaM, yes I would
> definitely expect calcium:CaM to be a species and to appear in the
> ListOfModifiers.

But the modifier is not calcium:CaM. It is the ratio between calcium:CaM
and total CaM. Therefore,
- either we define the ratio as a parameter and do not refer to it as a
modifier.
- or we declare both calcium:CaM AND total CaM as modifiers. Now, could-you
explain me how you draw a graph representing this situation?

> In the case of the pH-controlled reaction, if H+ is in the
> ListOfSpecies, but not in the lists of Reactants or Products for the
> reaction whose kinetic law you have written, then I WOULD declare H+ as
> a Modifier even if P were defined by
>
> P = -log[H+]

But modifiers are meant to correspond to the symbols in the kineticLaw. You
would end up with a modifier declaration pointing to H+ and a symbol in the
kineticLaw refering to P. 1) this is illegal SBML, 2) this is semantically
dodgy, 3) ... we go back to a situation where you have to analyse the
assignmentRule to fully understand the reaction! Which is precisely what
you criticised before.

> In the case of the assignment rule:
>
> "Consider the following assignmentRule:
>
> species A parameter X (not an entity pool) parameter Y
>
> if CONDITION 1 then Y = A else Y = X
>
> What is Y? "
>
> I don't think Y can be identified as a reactant, a product or a
> modifier.

Exactly. So if condition 1 is fulfiled, X represents a species, but you
would not declare it as a modifier.


____________________________________________________________
To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss

For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/

For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu

      

SubjectPosterDate
Read Message   Ancillary equations in SBML models Robert Phair28 Jul '08 11:11
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Robert Phair03 Aug '08 21:17
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Nicolas Le Novere04 Aug '08 08:20
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Robert Phair04 Aug '08 12:22
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Rainer Machne05 Aug '08 08:51
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Robert Phair05 Aug '08 16:12
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Ion05 Aug '08 23:35
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Nicolas Le Novere06 Aug '08 00:22
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Rainer Machne06 Aug '08 03:14
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Mike Hucka08 Aug '08 18:30
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Robert Phair08 Aug '08 22:42
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Mike Hucka08 Aug '08 23:41
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Frank Bergmann09 Aug '08 01:06
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Frank Bergmann09 Aug '08 01:02
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Pedro Mendes09 Aug '08 03:32
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Nicolas Le Novere05 Aug '08 15:23
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Robert Phair04 Aug '08 12:45
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models  Nicolas Le Novere05 Aug '08 15:20
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Ann Chasson05 Aug '08 10:37
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Nicolas Le Novere06 Aug '08 09:47
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Rainer Machne06 Aug '08 10:24
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Nicolas Le Novere06 Aug '08 10:45
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Pedro Mendes06 Aug '08 07:04
Read Message   Re: Ancillary equations in SBML models Stefan.Hoops06 Aug '08 09:12
Previous Topic:Preliminary agenda for SBML Forum
Next Topic:SBMLeditor-1.3.2 released
Go to forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Powered by FUDforum. (Copyright Advanced Internet Designs Inc.)

Please use our issue tracking system for any questions or suggestions about this website.