Forums

It would be okay with me if you just chose one version of one XML
library to support, since I believe you are providing the dll with the
libsbml build anyway. I would be interested to hear why others find
it necessary to have all the different libraries and versions (if they
do find it necessary that is).

Cheers,

Chris

On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Sarah Keating wrote:

>> This did the trick. It now works.
>>
>
> I'm glad you managed to sort this out - Thanks Frank for your input.
>
> We (libsbml-team) are currently considering whether we need to do 64
> bit
> builds for windows. Since building all the files for each installer
> variant is time consuming we are wondering which libraries people
> would
> be particularly interested in ...
>
> Thanks
>
> Sarah
> ____________________________________________________________
> To manage your libsbml-development list subscription, visit
> https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/libsbml-development
>
> For a web interface to the libsbml-development mailing list, visit
> http://sbml.org/Forums/
>
> For questions or feedback about the libsbml-development list,
> contact sbml-team@caltech.edu

____________________________________________________________
To manage your libsbml-development list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/libsbml-development

For a web interface to the libsbml-development mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/

For questions or feedback about the libsbml-development list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu