Forums

Hi all,

I'm not sure we need to go so far as to ask for a change to SBML itself, but
I agree with those that have already said a NamedSBase (or perhaps
IdentifiedSBase) class within libSBML would be very useful.

Thanks :)

P.S. apologies if you get this twice - I may have sent it the first time
from the wrong email address

2009/9/7 Oliver Ruebenacker <curoli@gmail.com>

> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Sarah Keating<skeating@caltech.edu>
> wrote:
> > Thus we need libSBML to reflect the SBML specification as closely as
> > possible.
>
> Maybe then we should lobby to have a NamedSBase in SBML itself?
>
> Take care
> Oliver
>
> --
> Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist
> BioPAX Integration at Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org/biopax)
> Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling
> http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org
> ____________________________________________________________
> To manage your sbml-interoperability list subscription, visit
> https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-interoperability
>
> For a web interface to the sbml-interoperability mailing list, visit
> http://sbml.org/Forums/
>
> For questions or feedback about the sbml-interoperability list,
> contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
>



--
Allyson Lister
http://themindwobbles.wordpress.com

CISBAN, http://www.cisban.ac.uk
Newcastle University
____________________________________________________________
To manage your sbml-interoperability list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-interoperability

For a web interface to the sbml-interoperability mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/

For questions or feedback about the sbml-interoperability list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu