Forums

F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Search Search
SBML Discussions » sbml-discuss » Proposed addition to L3 core
Show: Today's Posts  :: Message Navigator
| Subscribe to topic 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
Stefan.Hoops


Posts: 170
Registered:
December 2006
Re: Proposed addition to L3 core 08 Sep '09 09:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message

Hello Oliver,

On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:48:24 -0400
Oliver Ruebenacker <curoli@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Stefan, All,
>
> I don't know what confusion you are talking about or why you think
> you need to state the obvious, that SBML is about modelling. I also
> don't understand why you repeat Nicolas' argument that compartments
> are special because they have a number associated with it, while
> ignoring my response to that. I am sure we can add some number to
> entities as well.
>

You have several species in the same compartment thus having a
compartment entity facilitates normalization. Your alternative would
require manual synchronization of the compartment size for all species
in the same compartment.

> It surprises me that, after even Nicolas conceded the weakness of
> MIRIAM annotations, you still insist they are perfect and only
> "cumbersome". If you think that, then please provide examples how to
> annotate variant sequences, post-translational modifications and
> different complex formations.

I did not say at all that the way MIRIAM annoation is implemented in
SBML is good. In fact I am one of the harshes critics. However any
grouping mechanism will require the group to be annotated with MIRIAM
information to identify the group in a MIRIAM complian way. We all know
that names are not an option. Thus MIRIAM annotation will be part of the
final solution. Improving the capabilities of providing MIRIAM compliant
annotation is another problem.

>
> If a species is a pool of indistinguishable things, it is only
> natural that two species that contain the same indistinguishable
> things have a unique relationship and therefore require a unique way
> of being grouped.

The above is a logically wrong statement. How can two indistinguishable
things be distinguishable. It seems that my attempt to remove confusion
was not sufficient though you claim that there is no need for this ;)

Thanks,
Stefan


--
Stefan Hoops, Ph.D.
Senior Project Associate
Virginia Bioinformatics Institute - 0477
Virginia Tech
Bioinformatics Facility II
Blacksburg, Va 24061, USA

Phone: (540) 231-1799
Fax: (540) 231-2606
Email: shoops@vbi.vt.edu
____________________________________________________________
To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss

For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/

For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu

      

SubjectPosterDate
Read Message   Proposed addition to L3 core Robert Phair07 Sep '09 00:04
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere07 Sep '09 09:35
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli07 Sep '09 11:38
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere08 Sep '09 00:15
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli08 Sep '09 04:41
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Stefan.Hoops08 Sep '09 07:28
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli08 Sep '09 08:48
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core  Stefan.Hoops08 Sep '09 09:22
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli08 Sep '09 10:31
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere08 Sep '09 09:30
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli08 Sep '09 10:39
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Robert Phair09 Sep '09 01:02
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere09 Sep '09 05:14
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli09 Sep '09 06:54
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Pedro Mendes09 Sep '09 08:09
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Mike Hucka09 Sep '09 12:41
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Pedro Mendes09 Sep '09 14:52
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Mike Hucka10 Sep '09 00:13
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli10 Sep '09 05:25
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere08 Sep '09 09:12
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core myers08 Sep '09 09:41
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere08 Sep '09 15:34
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Mike Hucka09 Sep '09 12:13
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core hsauro09 Sep '09 14:07
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core myers09 Sep '09 15:30
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core mblinov09 Sep '09 17:34
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core myers09 Sep '09 18:16
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core eric.minch09 Sep '09 20:04
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere10 Sep '09 02:02
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Mike Hucka12 Sep '09 01:43
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere12 Sep '09 08:37
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Mike Hucka17 Sep '09 21:59
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Mike Hucka12 Sep '09 01:49
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core myers12 Sep '09 06:30
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere12 Sep '09 10:45
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Mike Hucka12 Sep '09 11:57
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core myers13 Sep '09 03:14
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli08 Sep '09 09:46
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere08 Sep '09 15:41
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli09 Sep '09 04:29
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Mike Hucka08 Sep '09 22:54
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli09 Sep '09 04:17
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Ion08 Sep '09 09:21
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli08 Sep '09 10:41
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Schaff08 Sep '09 09:30
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere08 Sep '09 15:29
Read Message   L3 core vs. packages Lucian Smith09 Sep '09 00:10
Read Message   Re: L3 core vs. packages Nicolas Le Novere09 Sep '09 02:02
Read Message   Re: L3 core vs. packages Mike Hucka09 Sep '09 12:06
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli07 Sep '09 09:48
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core Nicolas Le Novere07 Sep '09 12:45
Read Message   Re: Proposed addition to L3 core curoli07 Sep '09 14:31
Previous Topic:Reactome Pathway Database User Survey
Next Topic:(Fwd) New BioModels.net qualifiers
Go to forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Powered by FUDforum. (Copyright Advanced Internet Designs Inc.)

Please use our issue tracking system for any questions or suggestions about this website.