Re: Stochastic simulation in SBML
29 Nov '11 13:46
On 11/29/2011 09:39 PM, Michael Hucka wrote:
> Actually, SBML states the exact number to use, and references the source.
quite right, mea culpa..
On 11/29/2011 09:38 PM, Chris J. Myers wrote:
> As Pedro pointed out, there is not an agreement on Avogadro's precise
there is agreement, just that the exact value is not yet known but the
precision should be increasing in time.
As Mike says, the spec supplies a number and that should be used (or at
least that much precision).
Chair in Computational Systems Biology
School of Computer Science
Manchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology
University of Manchester
Manchester Interdisciplinary Biocentre
131 Princess Street
Manchester, M1 7DN, U.K.
To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,