Forums

Hi Andreas,

I agree with you; this makes sense to me too.

MH

On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:14:40 +0100, Andreas Dräger wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> since the very beginning of the JSBML project, it is structured as follows:
>
> JSBML
> |- trunk
> |- modules
> |- tags
> |- branches
>
> Recently, within the trunk directory, we now have the sub-folder
> extensions. I would now like to suggest to shift the modules folder also
> into the trunk and to create a folder core there, leading to this structure:
>
> JSBML
> |- trunk
> |- core
> |- extensions
> |- modules
> |- tags
> |- branches
>
> This would significantly increase the visibility of the modules and
> would also allow us to maintain all packages within the identical trunk.
> When there is a new release of JSBML, users could be sure that all the
> extension packages and all modules are compatible with the current core.
>
> Proposing this, I am looking forward to your opinions on this.
>
> Cheers
> Andreas
>
> --
> Dr. Andreas Dräger
> University of Tuebingen
> Center for Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT)
> Sand 1
> 72076 Tübingen
> Germany
>
> Phone: +49-7071-29-78982
> Fax: +49-7071-29-5091
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> To manage your jsbml-development list subscription, visit
> https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsbml-development
>
> For a web interface to the jsbml-development mailing list, visit
> http://sbml.org/Forums/
>
> For questions or feedback about the jsbml-development list,
> contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
____________________________________________________________
To manage your jsbml-development list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsbml-development

For a web interface to the jsbml-development mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/

For questions or feedback about the jsbml-development list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu