Forums

F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Search Search
SBML Discussions » sbml-discuss » upper, lower, mean, stdev
Show: Today's Posts  :: Message Navigator
| Subscribe to topic 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
Pedro Mendes


Posts: 123
Registered:
September 2003
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev 13 Jul '12 04:17 Go to previous messageGo to previous message

On 07/12/2012 04:32 PM, Nicolas Le Novère wrote:
> The big question is the package to which those attribute should
> belong to:
> 1) core (remember those are optional attributes)?
> 2) distrib?
> 3) another package? (at some point it was suggested to develop a stat
> package, for instance to extend the MathML).


I am probably too old fashioned, but I would actually add this to the
core. Programs could easily ignore the stdev attribute, but those who
know what to do with it could then take it.

The alternative would be to make a very small package that just adds
these optional attributes.

I agree with Nicolas that to force a full-blown distrib package is
perhaps too much and very few programs would therefore end up taking
this up.

Pedro
____________________________________________________________
To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss

For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/

For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu

      

SubjectPosterDate
Read Message   upper, lower, mean, stdev Nicolas Le Novere12 Jul '12 08:32
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev myers12 Jul '12 11:40
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Neil Swainston13 Jul '12 00:01
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Nicolas Le Novere13 Jul '12 02:55
Read Message   Rép. : Re: upper, lower, mea =?utf-8?q?n=2C_stde... Frederic.BOIS13 Jul '12 00:47
Read Message   Re: Rép. : Re: upper, lower, mea =?utf-8?q?n=2C_... Nicolas Le Novere13 Jul '12 02:59
Read Message   Re: Rép. : Re: upper, lower, mea =?utf-8?q?n=2C_... Andrew Miller15 Jul '12 14:13
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Nicolas Le Novere13 Jul '12 02:51
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev  Pedro Mendes13 Jul '12 04:17
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Herbert M Sauro13 Jul '12 08:08
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Stefan.Hoops16 Jul '12 07:29
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Stuart Moodie16 Jul '12 09:07
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev myers16 Jul '12 12:02
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Andrew Miller16 Jul '12 12:37
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Darren J Wilkinson16 Jul '12 13:26
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Lucian Smith13 Jul '12 10:55
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev bshapiro13 Jul '12 11:19
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Lucian Smith13 Jul '12 11:47
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Pedro Mendes13 Jul '12 13:40
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Sarah Keating14 Jul '12 03:11
Read Message   Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev Pedro Mendes14 Jul '12 04:02
Previous Topic:Call for votes on Level 3 proposals: 'groups'
Next Topic:Talks & posters at COMBINE 2012
Go to forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Powered by FUDforum. (Copyright Advanced Internet Designs Inc.)

Please use our issue tracking system for any questions or suggestions about this website.