| Author | Topic |
Posts: 140
Location: University of Utah
Registered: May 2008
|
|
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
16 Jul '12 12:02

|
 |
|
I think I we should release a distrib package without mutilvariate distributions first. There should be no problem upgrading the package later. From Sarah's message, I think we are gravitating towards adding a small, simple package for the mean, stddev, lower, and upper bounds. This is fine by me. I think packages can move much faster than core changes. Keep in mind there are a lot of items being discussed for L3V2, and they will require more discussion. No need to delay these items for that discussion.
Chris
On Jul 16, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Stuart Moodie wrote:
> I agree too. Especially as the current (post HARMONY) proposal is to use the arrays package to support multivariate distributions in distrib - i.e. you will need to implement support for arrays in order to support distrib.
>
> Given the view that it would be good to put this functionality in the core, one way to achieve this would be to create a small 'stats' package now and if successful move it to the core at a later date. Is this possible within L3? is there a mechanism for deprecating packages in future versions of L3?
>
> On 16 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Stefan Hoops wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:08:24 -0700
>> Herbert M Sauro <hsauro@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Pedro, simple measures such as stdev etc could easily be
>>> in the core. I am reminded of the saying:
>>>
>>> Make the simple things simple and hard things
>>> possible
>>>
>>> I think that most likely applies here.
>>>
>>> The distrib package could be used to hold the 'hard' information.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I more than second this!
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>>> Herbert Sauro
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Jul 13, 2012, at 4:17 AM, Pedro Mendes <mendes@vbi.vt.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 07/12/2012 04:32 PM, Nicolas Le Novère wrote:
>>>>> The big question is the package to which those attribute should
>>>>> belong to:
>>>>> 1) core (remember those are optional attributes)?
>>>>> 2) distrib?
>>>>> 3) another package? (at some point it was suggested to develop a
>>>>> stat package, for instance to extend the MathML).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am probably too old fashioned, but I would actually add this to
>>>> the core. Programs could easily ignore the stdev attribute, but
>>>> those who know what to do with it could then take it.
>>>>
>>>> The alternative would be to make a very small package that just
>>>> adds these optional attributes.
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Nicolas that to force a full-blown distrib package is
>>>> perhaps too much and very few programs would therefore end up
>>>> taking this up.
>>>>
>>>> Pedro
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
>>>> https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss
>>>>
>>>> For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
>>>> http://sbml.org/Forums/
>>>>
>>>> For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
>>>> contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
>>> https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss
>>>
>>> For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
>>> http://sbml.org/Forums/
>>>
>>> For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
>>> contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stefan Hoops, Ph.D.
>> Senior Project Associate
>> Virginia Bioinformatics Institute - 0477
>> Virginia Tech
>> Bioinformatics Facility II
>> Blacksburg, Va 24061, USA
>>
>> Phone: (540) 231-1799
>> Fax: (540) 231-2606
>> Email: shoops@vbi.vt.edu
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
>> https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss
>>
>> For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
>> http://sbml.org/Forums/
>>
>> For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
>> contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
> https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss
>
> For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
> http://sbml.org/Forums/
>
> For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
> contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
____________________________________________________________
To manage your sbml-discuss list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/sbml-discuss
For a web interface to the sbml-discuss mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/
For questions or feedback about the sbml-discuss list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Nicolas Le Novere | 12 Jul '12 08:32 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
myers | 12 Jul '12 11:40 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Neil Swainston | 13 Jul '12 00:01 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Nicolas Le Novere | 13 Jul '12 02:55 |
 |
Rép. : Re: upper, lower, mea =?utf-8?q?n=2C_stde...
|
Frederic.BOIS | 13 Jul '12 00:47 |
 |
Re: Rép. : Re: upper, lower, mea =?utf-8?q?n=2C_...
|
Nicolas Le Novere | 13 Jul '12 02:59 |
 |
Re: Rép. : Re: upper, lower, mea =?utf-8?q?n=2C_...
|
Andrew Miller | 15 Jul '12 14:13 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Nicolas Le Novere | 13 Jul '12 02:51 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Pedro Mendes | 13 Jul '12 04:17 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Herbert M Sauro | 13 Jul '12 08:08 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Stefan.Hoops | 16 Jul '12 07:29 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Stuart Moodie | 16 Jul '12 09:07 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
myers | 16 Jul '12 12:02 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Andrew Miller | 16 Jul '12 12:37 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Darren J Wilkinson | 16 Jul '12 13:26 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Lucian Smith | 13 Jul '12 10:55 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
bshapiro | 13 Jul '12 11:19 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Lucian Smith | 13 Jul '12 11:47 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Pedro Mendes | 13 Jul '12 13:40 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Sarah Keating | 14 Jul '12 03:11 |
 |
Re: upper, lower, mean, stdev
|
Pedro Mendes | 14 Jul '12 04:02 |
|