| Author | Topic |
Posts: 92
Registered: May 2004
|
|
Re: python bindings of libsbml-2.3.2 on Mac OS X
|
03 Jun '05 00:01

|
 |
|
Hi Mike,
For the Mac OS X python, my configure command line was:
./configure --prefix=/sw/apps/libsbml-2.3.2 --enable-layout --with-java
--with-swig=/sw/apps/swig-1.3.24/ --with-expat=/sw/ --with-python=/usr/
I also tried
./configure --prefix=/sw/apps/libsbml-2.3.2 --enable-layout --with-java
--with-swig=/sw/apps/swig-1.3.24/ --with-expat=/sw/
--with-python=/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/
Current/
with the same result. The -framework option was not added to the linker
flags and I got the missing symbols again.
I will try the whole thing on another Mac later on. I will let you know
if I have the same problems on the other machine.
Ralph
On 02.06.2005, at 21:54, Michael Hucka wrote:
>>>>>> On 2 Jun 2005, Ralph Gauges <ralph.gauges@eml-r.villa-bosch.de>
>>>>>> wrote:
> RG> I could solve the missing symbols problem by adding
> RG> -framework python to the LD_FLAGS in the Makefile. No
> RG> clue why they are missing. I also have no clue, why
> RG> the distutils from python won't work with this
> RG> release, never had a problem before.
>
> Hi Ralph,
>
> The -framework argument is automatically added by the
> configure command (the specific code is in config/python.m4)
> when it detects that the user is configuring on a darwin
> system and using a python executable located in /usr/bin.
>
> What was your configuration command line?
>
> Like Ben, I test the installation on a Mac (OS 10.3.9 with
> Fink python 2.3.3 in my case) and have not experienced this,
> but I have to admit my testing of different configurations
> is not at all extensive.
>
> MH
>
>
|
|
|