This remark is to the whole community, how many ode/gillespie wrappers
do we really need? Are there now almost 100 listed on the sbml site?
Instead of writing yet another sbml/ode wrapper isn't it time we
actually did something truly innovative?
From: Michael Hucka [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:20 PM
To: SBML Discussion List
Cc: LibSBML Discussion List
Subject: Re: [sbml-discuss] What do SBML libraries need to focus on
>>>>> On 21 Jul 2005, Stefan Hoops <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
shoops> What I definitely exclude are the following points:
shoops> - Computing higher-level information about a model.
shoops> - Solvers (mentioned by Howard Salis)
shoops> This can and should be provided in additional
shoops> libraries or tools by whoever wants to
Agreed. There is currently no plan to roll solvers into libSBML. If we
(SBML Team) do ever work on solution engines, I forsee them being
separate packages or libraries; it makes more sense that way.