Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #4: References to controlled vocabularies
15 Dec '05 12:15
Sorry if I missed something, but what are the arguments for/against
using the same or a different namespace here? I don't even recall
this part of the discussion in Boston (must have been snoozin).
On Dec 13, 2005, at 2:21 PM, Michael Hucka wrote:
> The topic of this vote is:
> REFERENCES TO CONTROLLED VOCABULARIES
> 2) In which XML namespace should the attribute 'sboTerm'
> a) The new level 2 version 2 namespace,
> "http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2/version2". In this
> case, the attribute would appear in an SBML document
> simply as 'sboTerm', in the same way as other SBML
> elements appear.
> b) The SBO namespace. In this case, the attribute would
> have to appear with a namespace prefix in an SBML
> (Note that this question is not about whether having to
> use a namespace prefix is pleasant or unpleasant; the
> question is about whether the 'sboTerm' attribute should
> be considered part of the SBML namespace.)