| Author | Topic |
Posts: 469
Registered: October 2003
|
|
Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #4: References to controlled vocabularies
|
22 Dec '05 05:23

|
 |
|
> Here's my point: reactions may include more than one parameter, and
> we need to identify which parameter is which. For example, suppose we
> know that a reaction is Michaelis-Menten-Henri, and we know the k1
> and the kD. We can not specify this information without giving the
> entire math field, because even though the kineticlaw is optional,
> if the kineticLaw is present the math is required, and the parameters
> are inside of the kinetic law.
Yes. Because of the sboTerms in kinetiocLaw and local parameters, I think
we should make the math element optional.
--
Nicolas LE NOVÈRE, Computational Neurobiology,
EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK
Tel: +44(0)1223 494 521, Fax: +44(0)1223 494 468, Mob: +33(0)689218676
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov
|
|
|