Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #4: References to controlled vocabularies
22 Dec '05 10:31
I see we agree nearly completely :)
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:21:13 +0000 (GMT)
Nicolas Le Novère <email@example.com> wrote:
> > However, in my opinion the MathML should
> > always be present
> But we already have valid SBML files without kineticLaw (Mike, OK,
> they are maybe not "SBML-compliant". But they validate fine and they
> are existing). In addition, other math element are optional (e.g.
A reaction is valid without a kinetic law (minOccurs = 0). A
kinetic law is invalid without a math element. As a result valid SBML
files exist without a math element.
> Nicolas LE NOVÈRE, Computational Neurobiology,
> EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD,
> UK Tel: +44(0)1223 494 521, Fax: +44(0)1223 494 468, Mob:
> +33(0)689218676 http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov
Stefan Hoops, Ph.D.
Senior Project Associate
Virginia Bioinformatics Institute - 0477
Bioinformatics Facility I
Blacksburg, Va 24061, USA
Phone: (540) 231-1799
Fax: (540) 231-2606