| Author | Topic |
|---|
Posts: 469
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Partial compliance [was] SBML L2v2 specification vote #4: References to controlled vocabularies
|
03 Jan '06 00:08
 
|
 |
|
> I think the best practical way of addressing this issue is
> to define degrees of SBML compliance, and to make the
> definitions operational via validation suites.
That would be a natural outcome if we modularize the language in Level3. A
system of packages, initially proposed by Andrew a long time ago, each
described in its own set of schemas and consistency checks will allow for
targeted validation.
--
Nicolas LE NOVÈRE, Computational Neurobiology,
EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK
Tel: +44(0)1223 494 521, Fax: +44(0)1223 494 468, Mob: +33(0)689218676
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov
|
|
|
