Forums

On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Michael Hucka wrote:

> c) Tools reading SBML should behave as follows:

> 2) If a tool understands only sboTerms and not the math
> formulas, it is like other tools today that do not
> understand SBML maths. Users should be made aware of
> how the tool is interpreting the SBML, and it might be
> perfectly acceptable to the tool's users. As with
> other tools that do not interpret the math, the tool
> would not pass all parts of the SBML validation suite
> and would not be considered fully SBML compliant.

That goes in favor of possible kineticLaws with only sboTerms IMHO.

--
Nicolas LE NOVÈRE, Computational Neurobiology,
EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK
Tel: +44(0)1223 494 521, Fax: +44(0)1223 494 468, Mob: +33(0)689218676
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov AIM screen name: nlenovere