Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #4: References to controlled vocabularies
23 Dec '05 15:46
Sigh. You're right, of course and I was unrealistic. Let's
push back the deadlines on all of them to keep things in
sequence and get past the holidays.
>>>>> On 23 Dec 2005, Darren Wilkinson <darrenjwilkinson@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>
>> #5 (id's on SimpleSpeciesReference): Dec. 23 midnight 6
>> #(reaction id's & assignment rules): Dec. 26 midnight 4
>> #(sboTerm): Jan. 3 midnight
>>
darrenjwilkinson> Mike, This probably isn't what you want
darrenjwilkinson> to hear, but all of the discussion of #4
darrenjwilkinson> (and I haven't even mentioned Volume and
darrenjwilkinson> Ph dependent rate parameters...) means
darrenjwilkinson> that there has been very little
darrenjwilkinson> discussion of #6. I for one am still
darrenjwilkinson> very unsure of the pros/cons of the
darrenjwilkinson> different options [...]
| 
23 Dec '05 15:46
