RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math' optional in KineticLaw
18 Jan '06 00:28
Hello,
I totally agree with Stefan and think his suggestion
> To overcome the current
> restrictions I would suggest kinetic laws for different kind of
> modelling, i.e. subtyping. This would also allow two supposedly similar
> models to be expressed in one SBML file, e.g. a stochastic model and an
> ODE model. Results could than easily obtained from two different types
> of integration. I am definitely opposed to removing the contents from
> the SBML and putting it in the annotation like the sboTerm. The model
> must be interpretable without it the annotation (sboTerm) provides the
> context.
should be a third option of choice in the #7 vote.