Forums

F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Search Search
SBML Discussions » sbml-discuss » SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math' optional in KineticLaw
Show: Today's Posts  :: Message Navigator
| Subscribe to topic 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
Mike Hucka


Posts: 967
Registered:
October 2003
RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math' optional in KineticLaw 25 Jan '06 18:01 Go to previous messageGo to previous message

Herbert_Sauro> [...]
Herbert_Sauro> such as biomodels.net do not consider these
Herbert_Sauro> to be valuable models and will not accept
Herbert_Sauro> them into the database.

For the love of all that is computational, no! Using the
word "valuable" here is very wrong. The fact that BioModels
Database does not accept those models *currently* is not a
statement about the models' value. They are valuable, and a
number of modelers work with them profitably, as you know.
The inclusion or exclusion of a class of models in BioModels
Database is not to be interpreted as a value judgement about
that class of models!

BioModels Database currently has a more limited scope of
models because it's been difficult to reach agreement on how
to represent and validate certain other kinds of models
using SBML and CellML. This will change in time.

MH

      

SubjectPosterDate
Read Message   SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math' opt... Mike Hucka13 Jan '06 16:15
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Stefan Hoops16 Jan '06 09:06
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Nicolas Le Novere16 Jan '06 11:57
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Stefan Hoops17 Jan '06 06:29
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Nicolas Le Novere17 Jan '06 09:04
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Stefan Hoops18 Jan '06 07:21
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Nicolas Le Novere18 Jan '06 13:22
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Stefan Hoops19 Jan '06 07:03
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Darren J Wilkinson19 Jan '06 13:28
Read Message   RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Henning Schmidt18 Jan '06 00:28
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Mike Hucka26 Jan '06 21:02
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Stefan Hoops27 Jan '06 04:58
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Mike Hucka27 Jan '06 17:19
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Stefan Hoops30 Jan '06 05:18
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Mike Hucka30 Jan '06 13:49
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math... Mike Hucka18 Jan '06 22:47
Read Message   RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Herbert Sauro23 Jan '06 15:35
Read Message   RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... tg23 Jan '06 16:05
Read Message   RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Mike Hucka25 Jan '06 18:18
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... jrohwer24 Jan '06 00:07
Read Message   RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Nicolas Le Novere24 Jan '06 01:07
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Pedro Mendes24 Jan '06 05:59
Read Message   RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'...  Mike Hucka25 Jan '06 18:01
Read Message   RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Herbert Sauro24 Jan '06 12:34
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Pedro Mendes24 Jan '06 13:14
Read Message   RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Herbert Sauro24 Jan '06 17:28
Read Message   Re: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Pedro Mendes24 Jan '06 18:27
Read Message   RE: SBML L2v2 specification vote #7: Making 'math'... Herbert Sauro25 Jan '06 10:54
Read Message   Results of L2v2 specification vote #7 Mike Hucka30 Jan '06 13:48
Previous Topic:Fourth release of BioModels Database
Next Topic:SBliD (SBML like Database) release
Go to forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Powered by FUDforum. (Copyright Advanced Internet Designs Inc.)

Please use our issue tracking system for any questions or suggestions about this website.