Forums

F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Search Search
SBML Discussions » sbml-discuss » Suggestion for new section in SBML
Show: Today's Posts  :: Message Navigator
| Subscribe to topic 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
Mike Hucka


Posts: 961
Registered:
October 2003
Re: Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML 15 Feb '06 10:58 Go to previous messageGo to previous message

ginkel> Well yes sorry, *but*: now people start touching
ginkel> extended use of SBML, where not all
ginkel> model-variables can be put into the semantic boxes
ginkel> of 'species', 'compartment', 'rate'. And also I
ginkel> present and discuss model representation in SBML
ginkel> and this 'Why is it called parameter, if you use
ginkel> it as a state?' appears to be a FAQ.

Yes, too true.

ginkel> What was the conflict of the name 'variable' as
ginkel> suggested by Herbert (and me)? I searched the
ginkel> forum and the wiki, but couldn't find anything. I
ginkel> remember very vaguely that you had some argument,
ginkel> which I can't remember ...

I'm not sure I was the one with the argument (maybe I was --
just can't remember it), but one point that comes to mind now
is that other things in SBML are variables, like species
concentrations. So if you have a separate "variables"
section, won't that be confusing too? And I don't think
you'd want to call it ListOfOtherVariables...
^^^^^

ginkel> Simplified Ontology: a Variable, flagged
ginkel> constant=true has the meaning of parameter. But
ginkel> parameter constant=false usually doesn't mean a
ginkel> state-variable but rather an input.

Hmm. I do see your point.

MH

      

SubjectPosterDate
Read Message   Suggestion for new section in SBML Herbert Sauro09 Feb '06 23:51
Read Message   Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML Rainer Machne10 Feb '06 04:46
Read Message   Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML Martin Ginkel10 Feb '06 04:51
Read Message   RE: Suggestion for new section in SBML rphair10 Feb '06 12:31
Read Message   RE: Suggestion for new section in SBML Nicolas Le Novere11 Feb '06 17:14
Read Message   Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML Jordan Atlas11 Feb '06 11:37
Read Message   Re: Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML Martin Ginkel13 Feb '06 00:39
Read Message   Re: Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML Mike Hucka14 Feb '06 19:31
Read Message   Re: Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML Martin Ginkel15 Feb '06 02:10
Read Message   Re: Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML  Mike Hucka15 Feb '06 10:58
Read Message   Re: [sbml-discuss]Suggestion for new section in SB... Martin Ginkel15 Feb '06 23:51
Read Message   Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML bshapiro11 Feb '06 19:52
Read Message   Re: Suggestion for new section in SBML Mike Hucka14 Feb '06 19:23
Read Message   RE: Suggestion for new section in SBML Andrew Finney17 Feb '06 00:53
Read Message   RE: Suggestion for new section in SBML Nicolas Le Novere19 Feb '06 11:05
Read Message   RE: Suggestion for new section in SBML Andrew Finney19 Feb '06 13:49
Read Message   RE: Suggestion for new section in SBML Nicolas Le Novere19 Feb '06 16:05
Read Message   RE: Suggestion for new section in SBML Herbert Sauro20 Feb '06 12:57
Previous Topic:COPASI Release Candidate 1
Next Topic:SBML L2v2 specification vote #8: Introducing CompartmentType
Go to forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Powered by FUDforum. (Copyright Advanced Internet Designs Inc.)

Please use our issue tracking system for any questions or suggestions about this website.