| Author | Topic |
Posts: 469
Registered: October 2003
|
|
RE: Suggestion for new section in SBML
|
19 Feb '06 16:05

|
 |
|
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Andrew Finney wrote:
>> d) add listOfStateVariables
>>
>> Those state variables can be any observables, already
>> declared as species
>> OR parameter OR compartment (the volume of a compartment can
>> be a state
>> variable!)
>
> I don't understand the motivation for this:
> species, parameter and compartment can all be declared as variables
> by setting constant = false (which is the default for species).
>
> What's the problem you are trying to solve?
> What is the form of a state variable structure?
I am not trying to solve anything. Personaly I'm mostly fine with the
current situation. I just meant to say that Herbert's (or Martin's)
state variables currently correspond to physical entities such as
species and compartments, or abstract constructs, stored as
parameters. If one creates a list of state variables, it should be
orthogonal to the other lists, not complementary. However, I perhaps
completely misundestood Herbert's and Martin's point. So I'll shut up
for now. ;-)
--
Nicolas LE NOVERE, Computational Neurobiology,
EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK
Tel: +44(0)1223 494 521, Fax: +44(0)1223 494 468, Mob: +33(0)689218676
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov AIM screen name: nlenovere
|
|
|