Forums

F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Search Search
SBML Discussions » sbml-discuss » New SBML.org Validator
Show: Today's Posts  :: Message Navigator
| Subscribe to topic 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
Mike Hucka


Posts: 967
Registered:
October 2003
Re: New SBML.org Validator 10 Mar '06 00:57 Go to previous messageGo to previous message

>>>>> On 7 Mar 2006, Bill Denney <denney@seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
denney> It turned out that the model that crashed the
denney> validator was mine. The problem was that I used
denney> Model instead of model. I would propose that
denney> every location in the standard where the word
denney> model is in a monospace font, it should be lower
denney> case.

Your timing on this report is very good -- we're just now
editing the final L2V2 spec.

I can understand the frustration in being caught by this.
I'm now playing with alternative font/face attribute
combinations to try to make cleaner separations between the
different kinds of entities being discussed. Hopefully the
next version will be more clear in this respect.

(Quick explanation for 'Things' vs 'things': There is a
distinction we were trying to make between classes of things
and their translation into concrete XML tags, and this is
part of why you're these different uses. Still, more visual
aids would be helpful.)

MH

      

SubjectPosterDate
Read Message   New SBML.org Validator Ben Bornstein06 Mar '06 13:00
Read Message   Re: New SBML.org Validator Ben Bornstein07 Mar '06 11:25
Read Message   Re: New SBML.org Validator Bill Denney07 Mar '06 13:49
Read Message   Re: New SBML.org Validator  Mike Hucka10 Mar '06 00:57
Read Message   Re: New SBML.org Validator Bill Denney10 Mar '06 04:05
Previous Topic:New Use for SBML
Next Topic:XSL for Web Viewing
Go to forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Powered by FUDforum. (Copyright Advanced Internet Designs Inc.)

Please use our issue tracking system for any questions or suggestions about this website.